
Marketing Intelligence
Decision Intelligence · 23 septembre 2026 · 7 min de lecture
Five real cases, no invented stories: Teknopark İstanbul, Netpak, Massive Bio, LG Electronics and ASELSAN. What decision changed in each, which number moved, and what all five have in common.
Most success stories are useless, because they describe the outcome and skip the decision. "Sales went up 31%" teaches nobody anything; what teaches is which decision came before that 31%. This article has five real cases, and in each one the point is not the number — it is the decision that preceded it.

All five are published and verifiable. No invented scenarios, no anonymous "one of our clients" stories, no rounded-up figures.
Companies usually measure digital maturity by how many tools they own: analytics, CRM, social listening, automation. But each of those produces its own panel, and nobody can reduce them to a single answer. Digital power is not how many tools you have; it is how fast and how clearly the answer arrives when you actually need to make a decision.
In none of the five cases below was the solution "buy another tool". In four of them no additional budget was used at all, and in one the budget was actively cut.
One of Türkiye's largest innovation ecosystems: dozens of programmes, hundreds of resident startups, and a brand that has to speak to investors, technical talent and policymakers at the same time. The problem was not missing data — there was plenty of data, but it was fragmented.
The team pulled every tool in the stack under one decision layer, measured what each contributed to the brand outcome, and found where spend was leaking. Within a single working period the inMOLA Score moved from 48.5 to 68.9 and the advertising performance score from 24 to 84; AI Visibility rose from 56 to 66 and MarSec from 57 to 65. The budget did not grow — the focus narrowed.
A B2B packaging manufacturer competing in a price-sensitive, relationship-driven market. Growth was the goal and the constraint was explicit: the marketing budget would not increase. That constraint kills most marketing plans before they start.
What was applied was not expanding reach but redistributing effort: a Pareto-based scoring model identified the 20% of customers producing 80% of the potential revenue, and sales and marketing effort shifted there. The result: a 31.04% increase in monthly sales revenue with zero additional budget. That approach runs today as inMOLA's Pareto Score module.
A US healthcare company working at the edge of oncology clinical trial matching, where every marketing dollar has to do double duty: reach patients and convince institutions, in a high-cost category.
Each channel's cost-to-conversion profile was scored, the waste was located, and budget was reallocated to channels with structural advantage. Within twelve months the company moved from 7th to 1st among seven major US oncology brands; marketing cost fell 67% and target outcomes rose 375%. Note the direction: cost fell while results rose — those two normally move against each other.
A global consumer electronics brand operating across dozens of markets. Data was abundant but did not speak the same language across geographies; the number a category manager saw and the number a regional director saw were not describing the same thing.
The marketing plan, digital assets, data infrastructure, communication systems and social media were unified into a single corporate framework, with a flow of 1.5 million data points. LG Türkiye reached 1st in the MEA region and 6th globally in marketing, digital and PR performance — in a period when competitors were getting more aggressive.
One of Türkiye's largest technology and defence electronics brands. The need was to move from instinct-driven campaigns to a measurable decision system across web, brand, media and social.
Digital channels were scored and valued monthly through a PR media valuation model, and advertising and media were then steered by that score. The outcome: Türkiye's number one technology brand across media channels, a Golden Spider Award for its web properties, and more than 20 decision cycles run — meaning the organisation still operates that rhythm today.
The sectors have nothing in common: defence electronics, packaging manufacturing, healthcare, consumer electronics, innovation ecosystem. Neither do the scales. But all of them match on four points:
What you copy from these cases is not the tactic. Netpak's 20% is not your 20%; Massive Bio's channel mix may not work in your category. The only thing that transfers is the decision rhythm: measure, narrow, execute, measure again. Reading a case study and copying the tactic is the most common and most expensive misreading there is.
A note on transparency: Teknopark İstanbul runs inMOLA as software. The Netpak, Massive Bio, LG Electronics and ASELSAN cases are engagements Erkan Terzi led as a consultant, CMO and marketing director — using the same models that run inMOLA today, but before they became software. We make the distinction because the two are not the same thing.
Those four common points translate into a roadmap:
inMOLA was built to run exactly that rhythm: from competitive intelligence to brand monitoring, customer scoring to marketing mix, the production modules share the same data and roll up into a single score. All five cases are at inmola.com/case-studies.
A success story is not told to inspire. It is told to show a decision system somebody else can reproduce. That is precisely what the five examples above have in common.

Marketing Intelligence

Marketing Intelligence

AI Visibility